Meaningful insights – can be used to generate in-depth insights into a problem or highlight new areas for research
Type of study | Purpose | Data collection | Pros | Cons |
Ethnography | Understand cultural phenomena within a group or society | Participant observation, field notes, interviews | Deep cultural insight Real world context Rich data |
Time-consuming Risk of research bias Access to groups can be difficult |
Phenomenology | Explore lived experiences of a phenomena | In-depth interview Reflective journals |
Captures true essence of live experience Emphasises participant perspective |
Can be subjective Requires skill in interpreting meaning Small specific samples |
Grounded theory | Used to develop a theory based on data collected from people’s experience | Data collection and analysing using coding to find patterns or themes | Produces theory grounded in real data Flexible and adaptable |
Large amounts of data can be overwhelming Requires rigorous coding Time intensive |
Case study | Gain deep understanding of a specific case or cases | Multiple sources: interviews, documents and reports | In-depth understanding Uses multiple data sources Real life context |
Limited generalisability Time and resource heavy May lack objectivity |
Narrative research | Understands how individuals construct meaning from life experiences | Multiple sources, such as narrative interviews, field notes, letters, photographs and diaries | Powerful story telling Highlights patients voice Good for marginalised perspectives |
Stories may be incomplete or biased Interpretation is complex Less structured |